Bansos

World Court holds hearings on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories | Day One

World



52 states will present arguments about the legal consequences of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories at the International Court of Justice

The ICJ’s six days of hearings starting on Monday come after the U.N. General Assembly asked the court in 2022 for an advisory, or non-binding, opinion on the occupation

Get the latest on the situation in the Middle East on the Sky News live blog:

#ICJ #Israel #Palestinian

SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos:
Follow us on Twitter:
Like us on Facebook:
Follow us on Instagram:
Follow us on TikTok:

For more content go to and download our apps: Apple Android

Sky News Daily podcast is available for free here:

Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí:

To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here:

world , World Court holds hearings on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories | Day One , #World #Court #holds #hearings #Israels #occupation #Palestinian #territories #Day
, Watch,Sky,News,Live,Stream,Israel,Palestine,Occupation,ICJ,hearing,February,2024,Palestinian,Middle East,Now,Happening,today,live stream,Feed,Hague,International,Court,Justice,Rafah,Gaza

44 pemikiran pada “World Court holds hearings on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories | Day One”

  1. There are voices throughout kindly help I am traumatized. I am reporting the need for intervention. Regards Dineo Jeanette Chaka Kutumela with Thato Mpho Jamilla Kutumela and Tebogo Mpholo Kutumela my id 710312 JHB ZA

    Balas
  2. .ENTRY INTO FORCE: REGISTRATION: STATUS:
    TEXT:
    Geneva, 10 October 1980
    2 December 1983 in accordance with article 5 (1) and (3). 2 December 1983, No. 22495.
    Signatories: 50. Parties: 127.
    United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 1342, p. 137; depositary notifications C.N.356.1981. TREATIES-7 of 14 January 1982 (procès-verbal of rectification of the Chinese authentic text) and C.N.320.1982. TREATIES-11 of 21 January 1983 (procès-verbal of rectification of the Final Act).
    2. CONVENTION ON PROHIBITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF CERTAIN CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS WHICH MAY BE DEEMED TO BE EXCESSIVELY INJURIOUS OR TO HAVE INDISCRIMINATE EFFECTS (WITH PROTOCOLS I, II AND III)
    Note: The Convention and its annexed Protocols were adopted by the United Nations Conference on Prohibitions or Restrictions of the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, held in Geneva from 10 to 28 September 1979 and from 15 September to 10 October 1980. The Conference was convened pursuant to General Assembly resolutions 32/152 of 19 December 1977 and 33/70 of 14 December 1978. The original of the Convention with the annexed Protocols, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, is deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The Convention was open for signature by all States at United Nations Headquarters in New York for a period of twelve months from 10 April 1981.

    Balas
  3. ISRAEL
    "(a) With reference to the scope of application defined in article 1 of the Convention, the Government of the State of Israel will apply the provisions of the Convention and those annexed Protocols to which Israel has agreed become bound to all armed conflicts involving regular armed forces of States referred to in article 2 common to the General Conventions of 12 August 1949, as well as to all armed conflicts referred to in article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.
    (b) Article 7, paragraph 4 of the Convention will have no effect.
    (c) The application of this Convention will have no effect on the legal status of the parties to a conflict.
    Understandings:
    (a) It is the understanding of the Government of the State of Israel that the compliance of commanders and others responsible for planning, deciding upon, or executing attacks to which the Convention and its Protocols apply, cannot be judged on the basis of information which subsequently comes to light, but must be assessed on the basis of the information available to them at the time that such actions were taken.
    (b) With respect to Protocol I, it is the understanding of the Government of Israel that the use of plastics or similar materials for detonators or other weapon parts not designed to cause injury is not prohibited.
    (c) With respect to Protocol I, it is the understanding of the Government of Israel that:
    (i) Any obligation to record the location of remotely delivered mines pursuant to sub-paragraph 1 (a) of article 5 refers to the location of mine fields and not to the location of individual remotely delivered mines;
    (ii) The term pre-planned, as used in sub-paragraph 1 (a) of article 7 means that the position of the minefield in question should have been determined in advance so that an accurate record of the location of the minefield, when laid, can be made."

    Balas
  4. It doesn't matter what 52 states say I have the actual laws…and Jordan was supposedly the Palestinian State.

    Balas
  5. It’s not an occupation ISRAEL HAS ALWAYS BEEN TGERE JESUS CHRIST YESHUA KING OF JEWS BORN IN BETHLEHEM 100s of YEARS BEFORE ISLAM INVENTED FROM WHISPERS FROM SATAN INTO MOHAMMEDS EARS

    Balas
  6. Isreal, won't be missed. Talk about messing things up. If I never see a dancing idf soldier again, 😂 how did they end up like that

    Balas
  7. If the Palestinian people couldn't stop the hamas militants from using their civilian areas as base for attacks on Israel -maybe its time to let a third party nation with soldiers whose religion is Hindu, Christian or bhuddist to take military administration of the Palestinian state. The civil administration will continue to be run by local Palestinian leaders through civil election process but military administration should be from third country that owe no religious allegiance to Palestine.

    Balas
  8. The world court may issue a warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu’s arrest but that won’t do anything unless there are people in the Knesset that will declare the prime minister to step down and he’d be arrested to face charges. But that’s a big if and sounds unrealistic like when they issued a warrant for Putins arrest. Are they doing anything about that no.

    Balas
  9. Can we not forget the Ottoman Empire’s defeat in WWI, after siding with Germany and genocidal attacks upon Greece, Assyria and Armenia, that resulted in a subsequent occupation and the partitioning of its territories leading to its southern territories, including Palestine, being divided between the United Kingdom and France as spoils of war.

    Balas
  10. The ‘world court’ has no jurisdiction over the sovereignty of ANY nation! Let only any nation that is defending itself from murderers like Hamas!

    Balas
  11. So an ICJ court for Isreal but nothing for the people in HAMAS who commited similar or the same atrocoties?

    Cowardice directed by emotion.

    Balas
  12. Fair enough, but he’s clearly not as prolific as he was, a genius as far as I am concerned 👍

    Balas
  13. There is no such thing as palestinian territories. These territories were captured from Jordan. Not Palestine. These arabs were not sovereign on this land.

    Balas
  14. Whatever this redundant court rules, is irrelevant, it is powerless all it is, is a focal point for justice, but it is incapable of delivering justice. It has no relevance to Israel, and the Zionist State will simply ignore whatever its findings or rulings may be. The UN and this feeble court must be replaced with a world body that is respected by all nations and has legislative powers to stop those breaking the laws of the Geneva Convention and make them accountable for their war crimes.

    Balas
  15. Don’t understand this court instead of putting pressure to Hamas to release the hostages and asking what the terrorist government of Palestinian has done to the humanitarian aid that country’s of the world has done for their citizens who started this war Israel has the right to defend their country and their citizens this court is bs of those politicians that they are getting paid by taxpayers people are useless don’t understand why they attack Israel so much

    Balas
  16. Israel Uber pressure for the first time
    The hypocrisy of its existence and terrorism is being revealed

    Balas

Tinggalkan komentar